Alien Arsenal Behind Scenes Featurette

Writers of Christian Fiction, specially Christian Science Fiction, or Christian Sci-fi, made their presence known long ago. We have been fortunate, as a society, to have seen the works of a lot of of the best writers in the Christian arena. Several of the very best, and indeed, the brightest and most imaginative have long ago passed off the scene. John Bunyan was one such writer. Bunyan penned the now classic work entitled The Pilgrim’s Progress, a work he did while imprisoned. Perhaps the most gifted and gifted of all the writers of Christian fiction was C.S. Lewis, who wrote the Narnia tales and other great Christian fiction. Works by Lewis have been indelibly imprinted upon the psyche of Christianity evermore. Lewis composed what a heap of would call Fantasy, and in all likelihood it was, but any story he penned was a outstanding deal more than that. It was allegorical to the point of enveloping a person into biblical principles that were inescapable. Lewis’ Christian Science Fiction tales were capsules of good vs. evil on a level that any person could experience and enjoy.

Of course, there are a great deal of persons who have downplayed Christian Fiction, and in particular any fiction that is Christian Science Fiction, or Fantasy, state emphatically and authoritatively it is of not much use. (Some would even say “of the devil.”) Many argue that fiction is a questionable means to present the truths of the Scriptures, arguing that if somebody decides to explain those facts, it would be more practical to formulate a simple essay or dissertation containing those truths. However, in this lies the very issue. Who will look at those works? Thousands upon thousands readers will just ignore such erudite tomes. However, they would be much more likely to peruse a narrative of wonder fixed on far-off worlds of make-believe. The unvarnished truth of the matter is that Christian Fiction presents a well conventional history of documenting biblical truths snuggled into worlds of fantasy. Those kinds of realities, together with the biblical truths presented, are now digested by tens of millions of persons, and these people have been made the better for these stories.

Christian Science Fiction is a genre that has been all but abandoned by Christian writers and publishers. That is unfortunate. This market has been fundamentally set detached for Fantasy and Futuristic fiction. A good deal of the reason has been given that it appeared actually hard, if not impossible, to squeeze biblical reality into a tomorrow that is rather mysterious and unknown. Writers are almost always hesitant of migrating too far from the revealed biblical future. Writing when it comes to alien creatures who are distinctly not humane beings and whose roots are hazy may be pretty disturbing to a novelist who has no desire to have to tell of events that are distinctly not possible in a biblical future.

Composing in a Christian Fiction environment, in particular a Christian Science Fiction setting, may be difficult because one needs a very good comprehend of the Bible. If a Christian writer is going to put forth a narrative that, while delightful and evidently fictional, nonetheless delivers a story that may work when it comes to biblical constraints, then one surely needs to have a better than working familiarity with the Bible. He or she needs to have read that book, cover to cover. Otherwise, the writer will not grasp when he or she crosses a great deal of other than as supposed or expected invisible line drawn in the sands of time by the Bible.

For example, if a Christian Fiction writer hoped to tell a story in regards to an world where wrong-doing doesn’t exist, that writer could effortlessly set his or her saga into the span of the thousand-year rule of Christ, the Millennium. That event is spoken of in the Bible. One may range far in his or her imagination when telling a story that takes place in that time, or even a tale that takes place after the Millennium. However, if that novelist starts telling of wicked effects by satanic powers on those living in the Millennium, the author will have made a severe error that will, in the long run, cost the writer numerous readers. They ought to have known that Satan, in this time, proceeds to be bound, and will be imprisoned, for the whole thousand years. After the amount of time of the Millennium is ended, the writer is free to explode a new universe of possibilities.

If a writer desired to spun a novel dealing with spaceships and aliens, that is lawful fare, and there’s not one thing in the Bible to deny this kind of speculation (contrary to the sentiment of many). A quick read of the book of Obadiah provides a springboard to the imagination of a writer of Christian Science Fiction. It is written there that: “Though thou exalt thyself as the eagle, and even though thou set thy nest amidst the stars, therefore will I fetch thee down, saith the LORD.” Book of Obadiah, 1:4 (The Bible). Clearly, the verse speaks of persons living in a far distant planet, “among the stars.” That strongly proposes space travel. A good writer of Christian Sci-fi may take those kinds of suggestions and fabricate entire worlds.

Once again, though, if the author provides a scenario where Earth is totally destroyed by aliens, then that writer has run up versus the strong wall of biblical fact. That is not a future depicted or even suggested by Scripture. The Bible delivers galore exceedingly apocalyptic scenarios for the future of Earth and the humane race, even moving so far as to represent sure things that tend to be seen as unquestionably alien, and even spacecraft. One need only read in the book of Ezekiel, chapter ten, to get such an image. However, there is no suggestion in Scripture that the entire world or humane beings will be murdered by alien beings. There is strong suggestion that aliens, or something akin to aliens, shall rain down murderous pain upon the world and humane beings. In the 9th chapter of the Book of Revelation, for instance, it is stated that galore alien-like beings will come upon the world and torment humans for five months. The description of these creatures is “like unto horses prepared unto battle…and their faces were as the faces of men.”

A Christian Science Fiction writer could distinctly run with those visuals. A Christian sci-fi story could without apparent effort be woven into a tremendous storyline from any number of suggestions and hints given in the Bible, that would enthrall innumerable readers. Many folks would read a Christian Science Fiction novel, or a Christian Fantasy book who would never open the Bible and read the truths embedded therein.

And that means more humans who take in interest in biblical things, and in the Bible itself.

Thus, Christian Fiction serves us well.

Alien Arsenal Behind Scenes Featurette

The all-new Kindle has a new electronic-ink screen with 50 percent better contrast than any other e-reader, a new sleek design with a 21 percent littler body while still keeping the same 6-inch-size reading area, and a 17 percent lighter weight at just 8.5 ounces. The new Kindle also offers 20 percent rapidly and without delay page turns, up to one month of battery life, double the storage to 3,500 books, built-in Wi-Fi, a graphite color option and more—all for only $139.

Alien Arsenal Behind Scenes Featurette Image

Alien Arsenal Behind Scenes Featurette Pic

Alien Arsenal Behind Scenes Featurette Image

Alien Arsenal Behind Scenes Featurette Image

Most helpful client reviews

28578 of 28879 humans found the following review helpful.
Kindle vs. Nook (updated 6/2/2011)
By Ron Cronovich
When I wrote this review last August, there was only one Nook, which is now called “Nook First Edition.” It proceeds to be available, but there are two new Nooks. The Nook Color was introduced last fall – it’s fundamentally a tablet computer, and runs the Android software that is frequent on a heap of smartphones nowadays. It’s twice as heavy and costs twice as much as a Kindle, but equated to other tablet computers, it is a very good value.

And now (early June 2011), a new e-ink based Nook is coming out. It’s called the “Nook Simple Touch.” It is just now starting to ship, so evidently I don’t have one and can’t tell you anything in regards to it that you can’t learn by reading online reviews. But the reviews are very favorable, so if you’re taking into account a Kindle, you must take a look at the new Nook Simple Touch, too.

But the Kindle is nonetheless still a compelling option. It’s a mature product, very well designed and easy to use, performance is very zippy, it’s competitively priced, and no e-ink based reader has a better, more readable display than the Kindle, not even the new Nook Simple Touch. Also, the Kindle universe is rather extensive: the Kindle store is outstanding and has galore thousands of free e-books as well as good deals on most other e-books, and once purchased, you may read your Kindle books on closely any device you own (computer, phone, tablet), not just your Kindle. And there are tons of great cases and other accessaries for the Kindle.

So, while my review compares the Kindle to the older Nook, I’ll leave it here because it has a ton of selective information with regards to the Kindle, a great e-reader that deserves your attention, and because the firstborn Nook proceeds to be available. That said, I urge you to NOT buy the initial Nook. It was a respectable e-reader when it came out in 2009, and still had numerous value when I wrote regarding it in August 2010, but it is without doubt or question inferior by today’s standards.

———— my basi review ————–

If you’re attempting to choose among a Nook and a Kindle, perhaps I may help. My wife and I have owned a Nook (the introductory one), a Kindle 2, and a Kindle DX. When Amazon declared the Kindle 3 this summer, we pre-ordered two Kindle 3′s: the wi-fi only model in graphite, and the wi-fi + 3G model in white. They arrived in late August and we have applied them very regularly since then. For us, Kindle is better than Nook, but Nook is a good device with it is own vantages that I will talk about below. I’ll end this review with a few words when it comes to the Nook Color.

First, reasons why we prefer the Kindle:

* Speed

In our experience, the Kindle is very zippy equated to the Nook. Page refresh speed (the time it takes a new page to appear after you push the page-turn button) was WAY rapidly and without delay on Kindle 2 than on Nook, and it’s more quickly yet on Kindle 3. Yet, I read a whole book on the Nook and didn’t find the slower page refresh to be annoying – you get employed to it, and it’s not a problem.

For me, the more primary speed divergence worries navigation – moving the cursor around the screen, for example to pick a book from your library, or to jump to a chapter by selecting it in the table of contents. On Kindle, you do this by pushing a 5-way rocker button, and the cursor moves very quickly. On Nook, you do this by activating the color LCD touchscreen (which commonly shuts off when not in use, to conserve battery). A “virtual rocker button” appears on the screen, and you touch it to move the cursor. Unfortunately, the Nook cursor moves very sluggishly. This might not be a huge deal to you, but it actually got annoying to me, specially since my wife’s Kindle was so quick and responsive.

In November 2010, Nook got a software upgrade that increments page refresh speed and makes navigation more responsive. I returned my Nook months ago, so I cannot tell you if the Nook’s performance is now equivalent to the Kindle’s, but Nook owners in the remarks division have convinced me that the software update improves the experience of using the Nook. If performance is a big factor in your decision, visit a Best Buy and compare Kindle and Nook side by side.

* Screen contrast

You’ve seen Amazon’s claims that the Kindle 3 e-ink has 50% better contrast than Kindle 2 or other e-ink devices. I have no way of incisively measuring the betterment in contrast, but I may tell you that the Kindle 3 display unquestionably has more contrast than Kindle 2 or Nook. The divergence is noticeable, and important: more screen contrast means less eyestrain when reading in poorly lit rooms.

In well-lit rooms, the Nook and Kindle 2 have sufficient contrast to grant for comfortable reading. But I oftentimes read in low-light conditions, like in bed at night, or in a poorly lit room. In these situations, reading on Nook or Kindle 2 was a bit uncomfortable and often gave me a mild headache. When I got the Kindle 3, the extra contrast was without delay noticeable, and made it more comfortable to read underneath less-than-ideal lighting conditions. (If you go with a Nook, just make sure you have a good reading lamp nearby.)

* Battery life

The Nook’s color LCD touch screen drains it is battery speedily – I could never get more than 5 days out of a charge. The Kindle 2 had longer battery life than the Nook, and Kindle 3 has even longer life: in the 3 months since we received our Kindle 3′s, we quintessentially get 3 weeks of battery life amid charges. (We keep wireless off regarding half the time to save battery power.)

* Weight

Nook weighs when it comes to 3 ounces more than the new Kindle, and you may in truth feel the difference. Without a case, Nook is still light sufficient to hold in one hand for long reading sessions without fatigue. But in a case, Nook is a heavy sucker. The new Kindle 3 is so light, even in a case, we find it comfortable keeping in one hand for long reading sessions.

Reasons numerous persons might prefer the Nook:

* In-store experience

If you need support with your nook, you may take it to any barnes and noble and get a real humane to help. You may take your nook into the coffee shop division of your local B&N store and read any book for free for up to one hour per day. When you take your nook to B&N, some in-store special deals and the occasional free book pop up on your screen.

* User-replaceable battery

Rechargeable batteries finally lose their capacity to hold a charge. Nook’s battery is user-replaceable and comparatively inexpensive. To replace Kindle’s battery, Amazon wants you to ship your Kindle to Amazon, and they will ship you back a DIFFERENT Kindle than the one you sent (it’s the same model, for example if you send a white Kindle 3, you get a white Kindle 3 back, but you get a “refurbished” one, NOT the precise one you sent them). I don’t like this at all.

However, assorted humans have posted remarks here that have eased my concerns. Someone looked up stats on the Kindle’s battery and did a great deal of simple calculations to show that it must last for 3 or more years. Before that happens, I will surely have upgraded to a newer Kindle model by then. Also, someone found numerous companies that trade Kindle batteries at reasonable cost and have how-to videos that demonstrate how we may replace the battery ourselves. Doing this would void the Kindle’s warranty, but the battery will in all probability not fail until long after the warranty expires.

[update June 2011: The batteries in the Nook Color and Nook Simple Touch are not replaceable, but the battery in the primary Nook is.]

* ePub

Nook uses the ePub format, a widely used open format. Amazon uses a proprietary ebook format. Many libraries will “lend” ebooks in the ePub format, which works with nook but not kindle. However, a free and reputable program called Calibre allows you to translate ebooks from one format to another – it supports a heap of formats, including ePub and Kindle. The only catch is that it doesn’t work with copy-protected ebooks, so you can’t, for example, buy a Kindle book (which is copy protected) and translate it to ePub so you may read it on a Nook.

* Nook’s color LCD touchscreen

The basi Nook has a little color LCD screen on the bottom for navigation. This could be a pro or con, depending on your preferences. It makes the Nook hipper and less drab than Kindle. Some people receive pleasure from using the color LCD to view their library or navigate. I did, at first. But after two weeks of use, and comparings with my wife’s Kindle, I found the consecrated buttons of the Kindle more comfortable and far rapidly and without delay to use than the Nook’s color touchscreen. I likewise found the bright light from the color screen distracting when I was attempting to read a book or newspaper (though when not in use, it shuts off after a minute or so to conserve battery).

* expandable capacity

Nook comes with 2GB of internal memory. If you need more capacity, you may insert a microSD card to add up to 16GB more memory. Kindle comes with 4GB of internal memory – twice as much as Nook – but there’s no way to exaggerate that. Kindle doesn’t receive memory cards of any type. If you primarily use your device to read ebooks and newspapers, this shouldn’t be an issue. I have over 100 books on my Kindle, and I’ve used only a tiny fraction of the memory. Once Kindle’s memory fills up, just delete books you don’t need prompt access to; you may always restore them later, in seconds, for free.

A few other notes:

Kindle and Nook have other features, such as an MP3 player and a web browser, but I caution you to have low expected values for these features. The MP3 player on the Kindle is like the first-generation iPod shuffle – you can’t see what song is playing, and you can’t navigate to other songs on your device. I don’t like the browser on either device; e-ink is just not a good engineering for surfing the web; it’s slower and clunkier than LCD screen technology, so even the browser on an Android phone or iPod touch is more gratifying to use. However, a great deal of commenters have more favorable views of either device’s browser, and you might, too.

* ebook lending

If you have a Nook or a Kindle, you may “lend” an ebook you purchased to somebody else with the same device for up to two weeks. The Nook has always had this feature. The Kindle just got this feature as of December 2010. Most but not all purchased ebooks are lendable, due to publisher restrictions.

* PDF aid

Kindle and Nook both handle PDF files, but in dissimilar ways. When you put a PDF file on your nook, nook converts it into an ebook-like file, then you may adjust the font size, and the text and pagination will adjust just like with any ebook. But you can not see the firstborn PDF file in the native format in which it was created. Kindle 3 and Kindle DX have native aid for PDF files. You may see PDF files just as they would appear on your computer. You may likewise convert PDF files to an ebook-like format, and then Kindle handles them just the way the Nook handles them – text and pagination adjust when you change the font size. Unfortunately, numerous symbols, equations, and graphics get lost or mangled in the translation – even when looking at PDF files in their native format on the Kindle. Moreover, the little screen size of the Kindle 3 and the Nook is not great for PDF files, most of which are designed for a more prominent page size. You may zoom and pan, but this is cumbersome and tiresome. Thanks to commenters who suggested looking at PDF files in landscape mode on the Kindle (I don’t recognise if you may do this on Nook); this way, you may see the entire top half of the page without panning, and then scroll down to the bottom half. This works a little better.

SUMMARY:

Nook and Kindle each offer their own advantages. We like the nook’s user-replaceable battery, compatibility with ePub format, and in-store experience. But we strongly prefer Kindle 3 because it is performance is zippier, it is higher-contrast screen is posing no difficulty to read, and it’s littler and lighter so it is more portable and more comfortable to hold in one hand for long reading sessions.

* Nook Color

Everything I wrote in regards to the Nook in this review applies to the original Nook (which proceeds to be available), not the new Nook Color. To me, the Nook Color is in a dissimilar product category than the Kindle or primary Nook. Nook Color has an LCD screen, like an iPad or most computer monitors. That’s a huge disfavor for people like me, who get headaches from reading a computer screen for long periods of time. Amazon’s Kindle product page has an informative section on e-ink vs. LCD displays.

But a lot of humans don’t have difficultnesses reading from computer screens, and the Nook Color is getting glowing reviews in the press and by owners. For the money, it offers a lot of functionality such as a good web browser and the capacity to play games and watch movies. But keep in mind: it costs a lot more than the Kindle, it weighs almost twice as much, it doesn’t come in a 3G version, and (unlike the initial Nook) the Nook Color doesn’t have a user replaceable battery.

2146 of 2182 people found the following review helpful.
I Wanted a Dedicated E-Reader, and That’s What I Got
By Matthew E. Coenen
I’m a first-time Kindle owner, so I have not one thing to “compare” the latest Kindle to. I don’t own a Nook. I don’t own an iPad (and, in any case, that’s comparing apples to oranges). I don’t have a Sony e-reader. ‘

This will be a short, simple review.

I received my Kindle regarding a week ago and haven’t been capable to put it down.

Things I like when it comes to my Kindle?
1. The e-ink display is amazing.
2. Using the 5-way controller is simple and effective.
3. Page turn speeds are more immediate than I thought they would be.
4. It’s lightweight, even with the attached cover (I have an Amazon cover with a built-in light)
5. Page-turning buttons are quiet and well-placed.
6. Recharge time is fast.
7. I may order a book and commence reading it in less than 60 seconds. Nice!
8. Portability… I may take 3,000 books with me when I travel for work and not require further and added suitcases or baggage fees.

Things I’m not too keen on?
1. Buttons are too close together and are laid out oddly.
2. Lack of person number buttons is frustrating.
3. Power button on the bottom? Not a bad thing. Just an odd thing. (Same for the headphone input). I commonly rest the “bottom” of a book on my lap when I read.

Things I hope alter in the future?
1. How books are organized… When I put a book in a collection (which is actually a “tag”), it still appears in the main list. It’s not in truth “moved”, it’s plainly associated.
2. The look of the main screen. I’d like “folders” or a good deal of other way to display “collections”.
3. Ability to manufacture personal “screen savers.”
4. E-book pricing, altho Amazon has little control over this. Still, most titles are the same price as or less than their hardback/paperback counterparts. (And I’m not opposed to paying more for comfortableness and portability).

Things that don’t bother me regarding other reviews?
1. The browser is experimental. Amazon has invented a committed e-reader, and it’s meant to be applied to read. Period. Not browse the web. If you want to browse the web, get a computer — not an e-reader.
2. The Kindle is not an mP3 player, either. Yes, it’s nice to have a good deal of classical music playing in the background while I read, but I don’t need to see the title of the song, album art, etc. (And you may skip from track to track on the Kindle using shortcut keys).
3. Lack of a “color” or “touch” screen.

In summary, for $139, I’m rather thrilled with my buy and have arleady read multiple books on it. In fact, I think I’ve read more in the past week than I’ve read in the past month.

1483 of 1508 persons found the following review helpful.
A hesistant buyer rejoices on his choice
By Mr Goodwrench
I researched the buy of a Kindle for a long time. I couldn’t determine whether or not it was worth buying a consecrated e-reader. Boy am I glad I made this purchase. The downside to Amazon’s online selling of Kindle 3 is that the clients don’t get to see it in person. It is much better in person. This may sound stupid, but when I got my new Kindle, I thought there was a stuck-on overlay on the screen containing a diagram of the unit’s buttons, etc. I genuinely tried to peel it off. Doh! The e-ink on this unit is THAT good. I didn’t realize that I was staring at the actual display. I likewise didn’t realize that no power is required until the display changes. (thus the great battery life) I do a lot of reading, but was facing the probability of reading less or buying big type books because of my variable and deteriorating eyesight. The new Kindle has been a godsend. Now, I may determine the size of type I need depending on my level of fatigue among other things. The weight and ergonomics are very good. For someone, like me, with neuropathy in his hands, it is exceedingly easy to manage and gratifying to own. To me, it is more comfortable to read than print books. The ease of navigation is great as is the speed. The battery life, so far, has been extraordinary. It effortlessly connected to our home Wi-Fi, which by design does not broadcast an SSID. It downloads books so fast that I closely thought they were not completely received. I did not buy the 3G version because of the price divergence and the fact that there is no coverage where I live. If you are not constantly traveling, I don’t see the need to spend the extra bucks, but that is a matter of personal choice. For those who have no Wi-Fi at home, do not forget that you may always download the material to your computer and transfer it by way of USB. Just today I was looking at an consultation with Tony Blair on TV. He was talking regarding his new book, which sounded interesting. I picked up the Kindle and downloaded a free sample before the consultation was over. I have only read the preface so far, but will probably buy the book. Now THAT is a outstanding way to buy a book! I haven’t employed online browsing broad yet, but find it reasonable for what the device is. This is primarily a book reader, not a laptop or notebook. They are outstanding for what they do, but can’t match the e-ink display, or the light weight. For those of you worrying regarding the wait for the new Kindle, let me end with, “It is worth the wait” This new Kindle is all with regards to the quality of experience. There are a heap of format selections for electronic reading. If you want the best experience, go with the Kindle.

See all 28013 client reviews…